Against cherry-picking

Nightmarish morning of  looking at  the Catholic bloggers just  cherry-picking Evangelii gaudium quotations relevant to America or the UK or their pet hobby horse. It is  so lopsided  when theologically untrained or politically blinkered First World bloggers come to think of themselves as  moral theologians or able to speak with any authority on how to read a document that is primarily and especially concerned with the poor. When I raced through the Apostolic Exhortation yesterday and  highlighted passages that  delighted or  challenged me, it was just a lay reader plunging into a text for the first time. I would cringe to think of anyone feeling I was  singling out those passages as more worthy of note than others or that I was presenting any kind of guide to reading a text emerging from a synod of bishops with (one hopes) detailed and  up-to-date understanding of their own dioceses, parishes and parts of the world and  what might be needed. And  Pope Francis not just synthesising these defined priorities, but making them his own,  emphasising  what is closest to his heart but in am embracing, inclusive and paradoxical manner.

 

Blogging is always partial, personal, provisional. I  shudder to think of ‘selected’ Catholic bloggers getting embargoed  material beforehand ( as has been suggested) and what these opinionated and ignorant lay bloggers might make of such a privilege. Why shouldn’t crowds of the poor of favelas or  refugee settlements get to hear  the Joy of the Gospel before others? Why not Catholic scholars who have  spent years studying traditions and teachings?

 

Ugh, ugh, ugh.

 

The best  commentary for me so far has been by the respected  and thoughtful insider John Allen.

Though he doesn’t lay out a comprehensive blueprint for reform, he goes beyond mere hints to fairly blunt indications of direction:

  • He calls for a “conversion of the papacy,” saying he wants to promote “a sound decentralization” and candidly admitting that in recent years “we have made little progress” on that front.
  • He suggests that bishops’ conferences ought to be given “a juridical status … including genuine doctrinal authority.” In effect, that would amount to a reversal of a 1998 Vatican ruling under John Paul II that only individual bishops in concert with the pope, and not episcopal conferences, have such authority.
  • Francis says the Eucharist “is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak,” insisting that “the doors of the sacraments” must not “be closed for simply any reason.” His language could have implications not only for divorced and remarried Catholics, but also calls for refusing the Eucharist to politicians or others who do not uphold church teaching on some matters.
  • He calls for collaborative leadership, saying bishops and pastors must use “the means of participation proposed in the Code of Canon Law and other forms of pastoral dialogue, out of a desire to listen to everyone and not simply to those who would tell him what he would like to hear.”
  • Francis criticizes forces within the church who seem to lust for “veritable witch hunts,” asking rhetorically, “Whom are we going to evangelize if this is the way we act?”
  • He cautions against “ostentatious preoccupation” for liturgy and doctrine as opposed to ensuring that the Gospel has “a real impact” on people and engages “the concrete needs of the present time.”

On two specific matters, however, Francis rules out change: the ordination of women to the priesthood, though he calls for “a more incisive female presence” in decision-making roles, and abortion.

Francis says the church’s defense of unborn life “cannot be expected to change” because it’s “closely linked to the defense of each and every other human right.”

The pope’s toughest language comes in a section of the document arguing that solidarity with the poor and the promotion of peace are constituent elements of what it means to be a missionary church.

Francis denounces what he calls a “crude and naïve trust” in the free market, saying that left to its own devices, the market too often fosters a “throw-away culture” in which certain categories of people are seen as disposable. He rejects what he describes as an “invisible and almost virtual” economic “tyranny.”

Specifically, Francis calls on the church to oppose spreading income inequality and unemployment, as well as to advocate for stronger environmental protection and against armed conflict.

 

A dream to live by.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. Get back to Quod Semper at once!

    Blogging is enjoyable and provocative at moments, a way of getting to know others.

    But really nothing more than caffeine-prompted thoughts, opinions, idle musings in between earning a living or washing up dishes or gossiping on Facebook.

    In lifestyle or investigative media we knew we were instapundits working from sketchy interviews and half-baked ideas and poor briefing. And insane deadlines. I attach no real importance to that kind of writing and nobody should.

    What I love and have loved all my life is erudition, the slow patient painstaking work on texts and historical documents. The dedication and care. That’s what I look for as a serious resource.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s